How much does Trump win in the US

"Trump's intention to abolish the civil rights of birth causes a political storm." Voice of America reported on Oct. 31 that Trump's plan attracted condemnation and criticism from lawmakers, lawmakers and the public.gay massage
In an interview with WVLK, Kentucky, Republican Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Ryan said on Oct. 30 that he supported the government's efforts to combat illegal immigration, but the president "could not abolish birth citizenship by executive order... As a conservative, we support the constitution. Republican Congressman Kulverlo on Twitter 30, also said that birth citizenship is protected by the U. S. Constitution, the president has no right to abolish civil rights by executive order, "What we really need is to make the country safer immigration reform, but also need to emphasize the U. S. immigration tradition." male massage The Democrats will not let go of a good chance to attack Trump. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said in a statement on the 30th that Trump's move was intended to influence the mid-term elections, demonstrating the Republicans'crazy desire to divert attention from their attacks on federal health insurance programs and other issues.
Equally intense criticism comes from the legal profession and the private sector. Dohono, a senior scholar at the Georgetown Constitutional Center, said in the Wall Street Journal on October 31 that Trump's statement was tantamount to saying that the presidency was above the constitution. Sarah Teberville, an American constitutional expert, said Trump was not a king and could not decide what laws were. "Caravan refugees are not a threat to the state and constitutional order, but a president who tries to end the right to citizenship at birth by executive order," the conservative editor of Banner Weekly wrote in a tweet Wednesday. NBC polls show that Americans support and oppose birth citizenship in about 2:1.gay club
There are also many public support for Trump. On Twitter October 30, Republican Senator and Trump's ally Graham lamented that "at last there is a president willing to take action on the absurd policy of birth citizenship." He claimed that the policy was a magnet for illegal immigrants, not in line with the mainstream of developed countries and needed to be stopped.gay sauna
"How to explain the Fourteenth Amendment of the constitution is the key to the problem." According to Voice of America, the bill stipulates that all people born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are U.S. citizens. Reuters said on October 31 that the amendment had been interpreted for many years to mean that children born to illegal immigrants in the United States would be granted citizenship. U.S. Vice President Burns said Oct. 30 that the U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on whether the provision applies to illegal immigrants. According to the Wall Street Journal on October 31, supporters of abolition of birth citizenship believe that "under U.S. jurisdiction" should be understood to exclude children born to illegal residents of the United States. But most legal scholars believe that denial of citizenship on the basis of jurisdiction applies only to those who are not subject to U.S. law, such as the children of diplomats. Those who support the abolition of birth rights also believe that this regulation has given birth to "fertility tourism". According to "New York Times" reported on October 31st, not long ago, there was also a case of a Chinese child injury center in New York. Trump would be blocked if he really abolished the right to citizenship at birth.neil massage
The Financial Times reported on October 31 that the president's use of executive orders to abolish birth citizenship is likely to trigger a constitutional struggle in the United States, and the Supreme Court will be the final ruling. The AFP said amending the U.S. Constitution was a long-term process, requiring more than two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives to vote on it, or two-thirds of the state legislatures to initiate it, and then to be submitted to the States and approved by three-quarters of the state legislatures, in a manner determined by the Congress when it proposed it. Under such a tedious condition, since the founding of the United States, the United States has only passed 27 constitutional amendments. It is reported that Trump's plan is challenging Congress, which is a violation of the constitution.gay spa
Addressú║ 181 Lane 1 Building,Changshou Road,near Shaanxi Northshanghai,china
Copyright Gay Asia and Asian Gay resources by Neil massage
ď┌¤▀┐═Ě■